New School Politics

If you're a first time visitor, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed, which will keep you up to date with all the latest New School Politics posts. Thanks for visiting!

I suppose that thirty-five years was as much of a break as we would get from the woman who committed treason during the Vietnam War by supporting the killing of American soldiers. Over the weekend she spoke at a rally in Washington D.C for an anti-war march. Once again she embarrassed herself and her cause by putting her face on the front of the anti-war movement. But, does she represent something inherent with the anti-war movement in Iraq today. Yes, the war has been executed badly, but it is evident in their rhetoric that none of the members of the anti-war movement have the capacity for intelligence to understand the consequences for withdrawal from Iraq.

If you are for an immediate troop pull out you are for a world war. It is that simple. It is not possible for American forces to leave Iraq with in the next 18 months without a major civil war, which would lead to a regional war. In the process of pulling out hundreds if not thousands of American forces would be killed in brutal battles as they retreat and millions of women and children in the Middle East would be massacred. Is this what the anti-war movement wants?

Jane Fonda, do your cause a favor, go back and hide away for another thirty-five years.

Last 5 posts by Eftychis

• Russian oil slump fuels supply worries - April 15th, 2008
• The Global Food Crisis - April 15th, 2008
• "Off-the-Record Obama" - April 14th, 2008
• Putin's inability to alter the international system - April 6th, 2008
• McCain's first general election ad - March 28th, 2008

Popularity: 23% [?]

The Jane Fonda, back again. by New School Politics, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.