Investing Against Achievment
Ryan | 25 08 2007If you're a first time visitor, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed, which will keep you up to date with all the latest New School Politics posts. Thanks for visiting!
Here is the most recent cover story from Time. It questions the present allocation of educational funding, wondering whether enough is invested in the brightest of students. Here is a taste:
American schools spend more than $8 billion a year educating the mentally retarded. Spending on the gifted isn’t even tabulated in some states, but by the most generous calculation, we spend no more than $800 million on gifted programs. But it can’t make sense to spend 10 times as much to try to bring low-achieving students to mere proficiency as we do to nurture those with the greatest potential.
That is really a jaw-dropping statistic, but it shouldn’t surprise anyone who has been in a public school more than once in the past year. And of course it makes me sound heartless, but allocating so much more funding to the mentally retarded than to the mentally gifted is just…retarded. It is simply a bad investment. When it comes down to it, all of us, especially the disabled, have the greatest interest in the geniuses of the world.
The brightest among us are the ones who invent the technologies that make our lives earlier, who pick the most productive of companies to invest in, and who find ways to deliver products at cheap prices to billions of customers across the globe at once. Much of the wealth around us can be attributed to the ideas that originated from very innovative men and women, and were shared and capitalized upon with others.
Without the vast resources produced by the world’s geniuses, we would never be able to support the disabled to the extent we do. As I see it, we owe it to the mentally retarded among us to invest more in our most gifted of children as they will be the most productive in the future.
Last 5 posts by Ryan
- For Republicans, a rock star is born - September 5th, 2008
- Campaign '08: Knocked Up - September 1st, 2008
- BREAKING: it's...it's...Palin?! - August 29th, 2008
- Scarcity, Shmarcity - June 26th, 2008
- The Greatness of Southpaws - June 26th, 2008
Popularity: 38% [?]
Sphere: Related Content
The Investing Against Achievment by New School Politics, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.






I don't know if gifted students should get more than
Simmons | 26 08 2007I don’t know if gifted students should get more than disabled students (maybe that’s not what you’re saying). But I do believe gifted programs should receive more funding. Gifted and disabled students should receive the same amount of money per student.
I still find it deplorable that 2/3 of all my
Eftychis | 26 08 2007I still find it deplorable that 2/3 of all my schools funding goes towards “Special education.” Americans who are in the top of their class are having trouble competing with students from overseas and yet our education system seems not care about the fact that the students in the top and middle of their class (the ones with the most potential) are being left out to dry (especially those who are just average in their academic performance).
why give money to smart people, rather than giving money
bdgrs | 24 09 2007why give money to smart people, rather than giving money to retards to make them at least able to get a job and be more valuable to society (i don’t mean that to sound bad)