New School Politics

School’s out. The New School is in session.
  • rss
  • Home
  • About
  • Links
  • Contact Us!

A Word On The Economy

Ryan | 6 01 2008

If you're a first time visitor, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed, which will keep you up to date with all the latest New School Politics posts. Thanks for visiting!

News this week was released indicating that the unemployment rate surpassed 5%. This along with $100/barrel oil, a very weak dollar, and growing inflation (here and here) are probably the consequences of the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates to the extent they have in the face of the credit crunch.

I surmise that this policy is probably creating more problems in the long run although it may calm the nerves of Wall Street in the immediate. Credit problems were the perril of loose credit, so it makes little sense to keep credit too loose in response.

Its sounds good, politically, to encourage the stimulation of investment with new money. However, economic laws still apply and by lowering interest rates against market forces we will reduce the incentive to save and essentially cause a shortage of investment capital.

Once again, there is a disparity between popular opinion and reality.

Last 5 posts by Ryan

  • Scarcity, Shmarcity - June 26th, 2008
  • The Greatness of Southpaws - June 26th, 2008
  • Step One: Open mouth... - June 23rd, 2008
  • Sobering Statistics and Economic Commentary - June 11th, 2008
  • Obama: Humbly setting out to save the world - June 8th, 2008

Popularity: 30% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

Creative Commons License
The A Word On The Economy by New School Politics, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Categories
Economics, Objectivist Content, Oil, monetary policy
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Romney wins Wyoming Primary-If it counts for anything Pipe down! I can’t hear Ron Paul! »

One response

I think a lot of people are probably asking themselves

Eftychis | 6 01 2008

I think a lot of people are probably asking themselves how much sooner would the market have corrected itself if the Fed did not exist, and more importantly without these controlled interest rates that permitted the credit crisis in the first place, we would not be in this spot. Indeed it may be that we avoided a short term recession and are only creating an even bigger one in the future.
Additionally, you commented on the price of oil-of course that is tied directly to the inflation of the dollar. As Dr. Paul pointed out, the value of oil has not risen against the price of gold; once again a gold based standard seems like it would make the most sense and return stability to the markets along with value to our currency.

Leave a comment

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Subscribe

Pages

  • About
  • Contact Us!
  • Links

Delegate Count

Category Cloud

Boys State/Nation objectivist Asides Drugs George PDF2007 Shea Sports space web2.0 personal democracy forum Blogroll Iacopo UK Chas New Hampshire Frank Liz race Israel gun control immigration France Book Reports Virginia Tech State of the Union History recession education Humor poverty Alternative Energy South Carolina tragedy Personal earmarks and subsidies Chou Paul Satire Darfur Global Warming healthcare Ron Paul sociology Florida Trade philosophy taxes Iran Oil Blog Maintenance monetary policy 9/11 Iraq entitlements Super Tuesday environment religion government spending regulation political philosophy Eftychis media Uncategorized GOP international Liberal Content culture Democrats Conservative Content Economics Domestic Politics 2008 Objectivist Content

-- Powered by Category Cloud

The New York Times

Translate

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox