New School Politics

School’s out. The New School is in session.
  • rss
  • Home
  • About
  • Links
  • Contact Us!

A Government Program Idea That Even I Support

Chou | 15 09 2007

If you're a first time visitor, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed, which will keep you up to date with all the latest New School Politics posts. Thanks for visiting!

Normally, I’m against government in all of its forms. It taxes and spends, and uses up citizens’ money for pork spending and unnecessary “aid.” However, I believe government should expand to one area: drugs. Not drug regulation, but cultivation and sales.

Think about it this way: are people going to stop buying drugs just because they’re illegal? Of course not. All we do is foster cartels, a black market, and waste billions on anti-drug campaigns. Why don’t we just target the source?

Here’s my plan. The government creates something called the Federal Department of Hallucinogens or whatnot. They can start by getting tobacco farmers to grow drugs, which they must sell exclusively to the federal government. Failure to do so will result in confiscation of land. However, the government will pay fair prices for each kind of drug.

Then, the government will manufacture them into a usable form. Because the government is heavily regulating it, marijuana will be in a pure form, not that cocaine-spiked stuff that they give to kids these days. Likewise, meth, for one, will also be free of the useless garbage-it will be sterile and safer. Dosage can also be regulated by the government. The government can then sell drugs to druggies at a decent price, allowing them to make a profit (including all the beauracacy, farmers, regulation). They can use this money to, say, fund education.

This plan has several effects: firstly, it will cripple the drug cartels. No money = no mercenaries, guns, and therefore crime. They will be starved. Secondly, the drugs will be safer and more regulated against OD’s. This will reduce such deaths. Third, the government makes money, not spends it. We’ll save whatever we spend on drug-regulation, and make money from the selling of drugs, allowing us to cut taxes and fund other things like education. Fourthly, we get more people employed, and we can keep them happy. Finally, the government will have a large stockpile of these drugs to use for military/scientific/medical purposes. What’s wrong with this plan? Almost nothing.

Perhaps the best part is that it will give us back, on average, $30 of our taxes. This may not seem like a lot, but when you account for the 300,000,000 people in this country, and the 150,000,000 who actually pay tax (middle class always gets screwed, poor people want higher taxes cuz they don’t have to pay them and get benefits, upper classes have the means to evade taxes via switzerland, etc.) that’s a lot of money.

Last 5 posts by Chou

  • Fishy Business in Florida - January 29th, 2008
  • Eftychis's Last Stand: Michigan and What it Means - January 17th, 2008
  • John Edwards' Universal Healthcare Plan - August 5th, 2007
  • The Problem with Socialists, Populists, and Their Derivatives - July 2nd, 2007
  • America: Land of the Double Standard - June 5th, 2007

Popularity: 52% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

Creative Commons License
The A Government Program Idea That Even I Support by New School Politics, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Categories
Chou, Domestic Politics, Drugs, regulation
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Bush Brings Some Of Our Boys Home Apostates Rising »

2 responses

I can imagine the public reaction now.... I don't support the

Simmons | 15 09 2007

I can imagine the public reaction now….

I don’t support the legalization of all drugs; some actually do have very harmful effects. And of course, any legalized drug would only be legal if you’re over 21.

Tobacco is a government regulated drug. Yet how come

Chou | 15 09 2007

Tobacco is a government regulated drug. Yet how come the public isn’t in uproars about that? We’re actually PAYING TAXES to help finance this, why shouldn’t we get tax money back?

Leave a comment

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Subscribe

Pages

  • About
  • Contact Us!
  • Links

Delegate Count

Category Cloud

Boys State/Nation objectivist Asides Drugs George PDF2007 Shea Sports space web2.0 personal democracy forum Blogroll Iacopo UK Chas New Hampshire Frank Liz race Israel gun control immigration France Book Reports Virginia Tech State of the Union History recession education Humor poverty Alternative Energy South Carolina tragedy Personal earmarks and subsidies Chou Paul Satire Darfur Global Warming healthcare Ron Paul sociology Florida Trade philosophy taxes Iran Oil Blog Maintenance monetary policy 9/11 Iraq entitlements Super Tuesday environment religion government spending regulation political philosophy Eftychis media Uncategorized GOP international Liberal Content culture Democrats Conservative Content Economics Domestic Politics 2008 Objectivist Content

-- Powered by Category Cloud

The New York Times

Translate

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox