<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giuliani Positioned As GOP&#8217;s Small Government Candidate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/</link>
	<description>School's out. The New School is in session.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rudy Giuliani Sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy Giuliani Sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-571</guid>
		<description>http://www.911reasons.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.911reasons.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.911reasons.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-417</guid>
		<description>while i disagree w/ paul on foreign policy particulars--although i do think that iraq is a mess and that "nation building" comes at a severe cost to the US--i will still support him b/c i believe his general political philosophy is a far greater plus than his pacifist foreign policy is a negative (basically i say that our net freedoms will increase by a lot under paul). 

but again what i am saying about giuliani is that he is the best of the rest in that he will be the most feverent supporter of smaller government at home. here is an article comparing the healthcare policies of romney and giuliani--i really do think that romney is completely hollow and that he is not much behind his cool facade.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=3436959&#038;page=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while i disagree w/ paul on foreign policy particulars&#8211;although i do think that iraq is a mess and that &#8220;nation building&#8221; comes at a severe cost to the US&#8211;i will still support him b/c i believe his general political philosophy is a far greater plus than his pacifist foreign policy is a negative (basically i say that our net freedoms will increase by a lot under paul). </p>
<p>but again what i am saying about giuliani is that he is the best of the rest in that he will be the most feverent supporter of smaller government at home. here is an article comparing the healthcare policies of romney and giuliani&#8211;i really do think that romney is completely hollow and that he is not much behind his cool facade.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=3436959&#038;page=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=3436959&#038;page=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasonik</title>
		<link>http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasonik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 01:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry to break the news, but you and that &lt;a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/printer/120338.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;disgruntled Dondero clown&lt;/a&gt; are simply ideological philistines. Get a clue.

At least vote for Romney if you can't grasp Paul's message. At least Mitt's wife and children still love him, and he's not evil to the core. Giuliani is a shameful human being whereas Romney, though ideologically misguided and a class A panderer, is as wholesome as they come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry to break the news, but you and that <a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/printer/120338.html" rel="nofollow">disgruntled Dondero clown</a> are simply ideological philistines. Get a clue.</p>
<p>At least vote for Romney if you can&#8217;t grasp Paul&#8217;s message. At least Mitt&#8217;s wife and children still love him, and he&#8217;s not evil to the core. Giuliani is a shameful human being whereas Romney, though ideologically misguided and a class A panderer, is as wholesome as they come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-411</guid>
		<description>Believe it or not, I do understand where “somebody” and “Jasonik” are coming from and those very arguments I have weighed myself. So let me first say that Giuliani is by no means an unequivocal advocate of limited government; simply he is the most in favor of limited government of all of the candidates from either party who actually have a chance of receiving the nomination.

I also understand that he is very much a self-promoter and that he has shown a certain authoritarian tendency when fighting crime, in the wake of 9/11, etc. however those cases by and large have to do with the means of running the government and do not relate as much to its ends or to policies. 

Additionally, remember that limited government is fundamentally about preserving individual rights, which requires government protection from belligerents foreign and domestic. well, my conclusion is that the areas where Giuliani wants more government generally relate to serving those functions-keeping law and order as well as punishing foreign enemies.

I additionally recognize that Giuliani holds a different view on how to deal with the Islamist threat than most libertarians (neolibertarians, Objectivists, as well as others aside). However his dissention does not represent a departure from libertarian philosophy in that he believes that since we were attacked and since there exists a real and potent threat to our liberties that our government must fight the threat until it is destroyed. Basically Paul and Giuliani have evaluated the threat in two different ways—the former believes that it is created by American intervention and the latter believes that its cause is an ideology that wants Islam to conquer the world—and thus their policies accord.

All I am saying is that Giuliani appears to hold a political philosophy that is closer to a philosophy of limited government than the other frontrunners in his party—Thompson, Romney, McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not, I do understand where “somebody” and “Jasonik” are coming from and those very arguments I have weighed myself. So let me first say that Giuliani is by no means an unequivocal advocate of limited government; simply he is the most in favor of limited government of all of the candidates from either party who actually have a chance of receiving the nomination.</p>
<p>I also understand that he is very much a self-promoter and that he has shown a certain authoritarian tendency when fighting crime, in the wake of 9/11, etc. however those cases by and large have to do with the means of running the government and do not relate as much to its ends or to policies. </p>
<p>Additionally, remember that limited government is fundamentally about preserving individual rights, which requires government protection from belligerents foreign and domestic. well, my conclusion is that the areas where Giuliani wants more government generally relate to serving those functions-keeping law and order as well as punishing foreign enemies.</p>
<p>I additionally recognize that Giuliani holds a different view on how to deal with the Islamist threat than most libertarians (neolibertarians, Objectivists, as well as others aside). However his dissention does not represent a departure from libertarian philosophy in that he believes that since we were attacked and since there exists a real and potent threat to our liberties that our government must fight the threat until it is destroyed. Basically Paul and Giuliani have evaluated the threat in two different ways—the former believes that it is created by American intervention and the latter believes that its cause is an ideology that wants Islam to conquer the world—and thus their policies accord.</p>
<p>All I am saying is that Giuliani appears to hold a political philosophy that is closer to a philosophy of limited government than the other frontrunners in his party—Thompson, Romney, McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Giuliani Positioned As GOP’s Small Government Candidate&#160;by&#160;insurance.ZapiZapi.com</title>
		<link>http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Giuliani Positioned As GOP’s Small Government Candidate&#160;by&#160;insurance.ZapiZapi.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-407</guid>
		<description>[...] over year-to-year for medical expenses, under Giuliani’s plan. &#8230;   article continues at Ryan brought to you by insurance and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over year-to-year for medical expenses, under Giuliani’s plan. &#8230;   article continues at Ryan brought to you by insurance and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Dondero</title>
		<link>http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Dondero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Yes, indeed.  Rudy Giuliani is the closest to Ron Paul's limited government views.  Note, ontheissues.org rates Ron Paul at 70/70 and Rudy Giuliani right behind him with 60/60.  Obviously, Giuliani is far more electable, and has broader appeal.  

Eric Dondero, Fmr. Senior Aide
US Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX)
1997-2003

now National Chairman,
Libertarians for Giuliani at www.mainstreamlibertarian.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, indeed.  Rudy Giuliani is the closest to Ron Paul&#8217;s limited government views.  Note, ontheissues.org rates Ron Paul at 70/70 and Rudy Giuliani right behind him with 60/60.  Obviously, Giuliani is far more electable, and has broader appeal.  </p>
<p>Eric Dondero, Fmr. Senior Aide<br />
US Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX)<br />
1997-2003</p>
<p>now National Chairman,<br />
Libertarians for Giuliani at <a href="http://www.mainstreamlibertarian.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mainstreamlibertarian.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasonik</title>
		<link>http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasonik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-404</guid>
		<description>"Although I am supporting Ron Paul–who is the truest advocate of limited domestic government–I concede that I would support Rudy Giuliani out of the top four GOP contenders (Giuliani, Thompson, McCain, and Romney). And furthermore I urge those Republicans who long to stop the advance of the nanny state to support Giuliani in the face of the most popular alternatives."

Giuliani is a police state proto-fascist who has merely co-opted Ron Paul's rhetoric.  Don't be fooled by Giuliani, he is a corrupt duplicitous authoritarian demagogue bent only on gaining power for himself and his criminal cronies.

Judging from the above, you don't understand Ron Paul's positions or ideology if "9/11 Rudy" is seen as a palatable substitute.

There can be no substitute for LIBERTY, no substitute for TRUTH, and no substitute for INTEGRITY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Although I am supporting Ron Paul–who is the truest advocate of limited domestic government–I concede that I would support Rudy Giuliani out of the top four GOP contenders (Giuliani, Thompson, McCain, and Romney). And furthermore I urge those Republicans who long to stop the advance of the nanny state to support Giuliani in the face of the most popular alternatives.&#8221;</p>
<p>Giuliani is a police state proto-fascist who has merely co-opted Ron Paul&#8217;s rhetoric.  Don&#8217;t be fooled by Giuliani, he is a corrupt duplicitous authoritarian demagogue bent only on gaining power for himself and his criminal cronies.</p>
<p>Judging from the above, you don&#8217;t understand Ron Paul&#8217;s positions or ideology if &#8220;9/11 Rudy&#8221; is seen as a palatable substitute.</p>
<p>There can be no substitute for LIBERTY, no substitute for TRUTH, and no substitute for INTEGRITY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somebody</title>
		<link>http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newschoolpolitics.com/2008/giuliani-positioned-as-gops-small-government-candidate/#comment-403</guid>
		<description>The problem is I think Rudy will just be a continuation of Bush's foreign policy. And you can't have a global War on Terror without big government and more invasion of our privacies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is I think Rudy will just be a continuation of Bush&#8217;s foreign policy. And you can&#8217;t have a global War on Terror without big government and more invasion of our privacies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.407 seconds -->
